PHP 8.1.31 Released!

Comparación entre generadores y objetos Iterator

La principal ventaja de los generadores es su simplicadad. Se ha de escribir mucho menos código repetitivo en comparación con el necesario para implementar una clase Iterator, y el código es generalmente mucho más legible. Por ejemplo, la siguiente función y clase son equivalentes:

<?php
function getLinesFromFile($fileName) {
if (!
$fileHandle = fopen($fileName, 'r')) {
return;
}

while (
false !== $line = fgets($fileHandle)) {
yield
$line;
}

fclose($fileHandle);
}

// Contra...

class LineIterator implements Iterator {
protected
$fileHandle;

protected
$line;
protected
$i;

public function
__construct($fileName) {
if (!
$this->fileHandle = fopen($fileName, 'r')) {
throw new
RuntimeException('Couldn\'t open file "' . $fileName . '"');
}
}

public function
rewind() {
fseek($this->fileHandle, 0);
$this->line = fgets($this->fileHandle);
$this->i = 0;
}

public function
valid() {
return
false !== $this->line;
}

public function
current() {
return
$this->line;
}

public function
key() {
return
$this->i;
}

public function
next() {
if (
false !== $this->line) {
$this->line = fgets($this->fileHandle);
$this->i++;
}
}

public function
__destruct() {
fclose($this->fileHandle);
}
}
?>

La flexibilidad, sin embargo, tiene un coste: los generadores son iteradores unidireccionales, ya que no pueden ser rebobinados una vez la iteración ha empezado. Esto también significa que se puede iterar sobre el mismo generador varias veces: el generador necesitará ser reconstruido llamando a la función generadora de nuevo.

add a note

User Contributed Notes 2 notes

up
107
mNOSPAMsenghaa at nospam dot gmail dot com
11 years ago
This hardly seems a fair comparison between the two examples, size-for-size. As noted, generators are forward-only, meaning that it should be compared to an iterator with a dummy rewind function defined. Also, to be fair, since the iterator throws an exception, shouldn't the generator example also throw the same exception? The code comparison would become more like this:

<?php
function getLinesFromFile($fileName) {
if (!
$fileHandle = fopen($fileName, 'r')) {
throw new
RuntimeException('Couldn\'t open file "' . $fileName . '"');
}

while (
false !== $line = fgets($fileHandle)) {
yield
$line;
}

fclose($fileHandle);
}

// versus...

class LineIterator implements Iterator {
protected
$fileHandle;

protected
$line;
protected
$i;

public function
__construct($fileName) {
if (!
$this->fileHandle = fopen($fileName, 'r')) {
throw new
RuntimeException('Couldn\'t open file "' . $fileName . '"');
}
}

public function
rewind() { }

public function
valid() {
return
false !== $this->line;
}

public function
current() {
return
$this->line;
}

public function
key() {
return
$this->i;
}

public function
next() {
if (
false !== $this->line) {
$this->line = fgets($this->fileHandle);
$this->i++;
}
}

public function
__destruct() {
fclose($this->fileHandle);
}
}
?>

The generator is still obviously much shorter, but this seems a more reasonable comparison.
up
23
sergeyzsg at yandex dot ru
10 years ago
I think that this is bad generator example.
If user will not consume all lines then file will not be closed.

<?php
function getLinesFromFile($fileHandle) {
while (
false !== $line = fgets($fileHandle)) {
yield
$line;
}
}

if (
$fileHandle = fopen($fileName, 'r')) {
/*
something with getLinesFromFile
*/
fclose($fileHandle);
}
?>
To Top