If you receive an error like:
Warning: ftp_nb_put(): Unable to service PORT commands in /path/to/file.php on line 27
verify whether you need to be in PASV mode. You can go into PASV mode by declaring
> ftp_pasv($cnx,TRUE);
(PHP 4 >= 4.3.0, PHP 5, PHP 7, PHP 8)
ftp_nb_put — 存储一个文件至 FTP 服务器（non-blocking）
$ftp,$remote_filename,$local_filename,$mode = FTP_BINARY,$offset = 0
ftp_nb_put() 函数用来把本地文件 local_file
存储到 FTP 服务器上由 remote_file 参数指定的路径。
与函数 ftp_put() 不同的是，此函数上传文件的时候采用的是异步传输模式，也就意味着在文件传送的过程中，你的程序可以继续干其它的事情。
ftpFTP\Connection 实例。
remote_filename远程文件路径。
local_filename本地文件路径。
mode
传输模式选择，可选参数为 FTP_ASCII（文本模式）或
FTP_BINARY（二进制模式）。
offset指定传输开始的位置，用来续传支持。
返回 FTP_FAILED 或 FTP_FINISHED
或 FTP_MOREDATA，打开本地文件失败时为 false。
| 版本 | 说明 |
|---|---|
| 8.1.0 |
现在 ftp 参数接受 FTP\Connection
实例，之前接受 resource。
|
| 7.3.0 |
mode 参数为可选，之前版本中为必填。
|
示例 #1 ftp_nb_put() 示例
<?php
// 初始化
$ret = ftp_nb_put($ftp, "test.remote", "test.local", FTP_BINARY);
while ($ret == FTP_MOREDATA) {
// 可以同时干其它事
echo ".";
// 继续上传...
$ret = ftp_nb_continue($ftp);
}
if ($ret != FTP_FINISHED) {
echo "上传过程中发生错误...";
exit(1);
}
?>示例 #2 使用 ftp_nb_put() 来续传文件
<?php
// 初始化
$ret = ftp_nb_put($ftp, "test.remote", "test.local",
FTP_BINARY, ftp_size("test.remote"));
// 另一种写法: $ret = ftp_nb_put($ftp, "test.remote", "test.local",
// FTP_BINARY, FTP_AUTORESUME);
while ($ret == FTP_MOREDATA) {
// 可以同时干其它事情
echo ".";
// 继续上传...
$ret = ftp_nb_continue($ftp);
}
if ($ret != FTP_FINISHED) {
echo "上传过程中发生错误...";
exit(1);
}
?>
If you receive an error like:
Warning: ftp_nb_put(): Unable to service PORT commands in /path/to/file.php on line 27
verify whether you need to be in PASV mode. You can go into PASV mode by declaring
> ftp_pasv($cnx,TRUE);When using non blocking functions if you try to disconnect while your non blocking operation is in progress the disconnect command will not work until the operation is not finished.Don't add a sleep() inside the loop. If you do you will severely slow down the upload.
In my tests, each time through the loop it send about 2.5K, looping about 220 times per second. (Which is very little.)
You won't necessarily get the same numbers as me per loop, but clearly PHP does it's own management of the loop so that you don't consume all the CPU on the server.How to realize the possibility of transferring data from one FTP-server to another via FXP:
<?php
// ...
$ansver = ftp_raw($ftp_conn1, 'PASV');
if (intval($ansver[0]) == 227) {
ftp_raw($ftp_conn2, 'PORT '.substr($ansver[0], $n = strpos($ansver[0], '(') + 1, strpos($m[0], ')', $n) - $n));
ftp_raw($ftp_conn1, 'STOR '.$filename); // need asynchronously (non-blocking)
ftp_raw($ftp_conn2, 'RETR '.$filename);
}
?>Hi,
I tried to use both ftp_put() and ftp_nb_put() adding the
variable $start = date("Y:m:d h:i:s"); at the begin of the script and the variable $end = date("Y:m:d h:i:s"); at its end, after the file upload function.
With the gprs connection I'm now using and trying to upload a .jpg file of 67,5 kb the time difference between $start and $end was 40 seconds in both cases, so I can suppose that there is no difference between these upload function.
The difference comes if you put anything inside the while ($ftp_upload == FTP_MOREDATA) loop.
I hope this note can help.
RegardsI couldn't see this noted anywhere...
ftp_nb_put apparently takes a much much longer time to upload the file than ftp_put (I haven't done any packet sniffing or logging tests to find out why). I was using a script, nearly identical to the example above, and a 100KB file had only uploaded 3.99KB after about 8 minutes! The php script naturally timed out before it was complete.
I changed my function to use ftp_put, got rid of the loop to check FTP_MOREDATA (as you will see in the example above), and the same script uploaded 2.2MB within 30 seconds with no other changes.
If you're using this function instead of ftp_put *purely to try to speed up your script* and it's taking a long time, you might want to try ftp_put instead.